![]() Super Mario 32's cover does a good job of evoking the feeling of a straight downgrade to SM64, while the cover of World at War, again, evokes absolutely no feeling of war.Įnjl wrote:Those logos are a good start! The Mickey one is my favourite out of the bunch because it looks the most crisp and has a clear distinction between title and subtitle. again try to think of the message behind the elements. In the context of cover art (the backgrounds on 3 of these). And there's a gear throwing the balance off. In the case of the Mickey logo, the reader's eyes have to move to a new line after every word, which feels a bit weird. In the case of the World at War logo, the focus very much lies on "Super Mario", rather than the part of the logo that I'd consider the important one. think about the balance of a logo and where the viewer's eyes are drawn. The Mario font generally is pretty playful so it gives a lighthearted tone, while a more rigid font can be used for more serious tones Font and layout in logos emit a certain feeling to the reader. think about the message behind the logo. The colours of "and the friends" make these "friends" seem oddly sinister, which stands in complete contrast to the tone given by the font used. Aside from being unbalanced it lacks punctuation, has inconsistent shadows and very poor colour choices. I think the last logo is a bit of a typographical mess. In the case of the Super Mario 32 logo it feels like all the colours were just randomly chosen, which I think is pretty weak. In the case of the World at War logo I think that the subtitle deserves its own colour and perhaps its own font as well considering the tone of the message. I think the trend of repeating the same color pattern for letters within the 2 Mario logos is pretty lazy and makes the overall logo less interesting. I think all it does is decrease the overall fidelity of the piece, especially when you start looking at the edges of letters. The Super Mario 32 and World at War logos are pretty balanced, but I'm really not a fan of the bloom that's present in all of these. ![]() It would also not have hurt to give Mickey some shading so that his head doesn't get absorbed by the S. The characters, I think, are a bit superfluous, but I think a bigger problem than having them is the fact that you forgot to remove the white space between their legs. I think it could benefit from being layed out in either of these ways though, to balance it out a bit and make it more widescreen-oriented: Those logos are a good start! The Mickey one is my favourite out of the bunch because it looks the most crisp and has a clear distinction between title and subtitle.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |